🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold policy to ban social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves internationally. Officials, child protection groups, and guardians are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

European Movement

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of countries are exploring comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a ban on social media for under-15s, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "robbing our kids' innocence". Legislation may be passed next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a age restriction of 15, citing the need to shield the young from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is working on a online verification tool to confirm the user details of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "one of the measures in reserve".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to enact a bill increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has urged families to prevent their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a non-binding motion demanding a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is given. Although it cautions of the "habit-forming" design of these apps, the move does not enact mandatory rules.

"A strong age barrier is a useful first step," stated the parliamentarian behind the resolution.

The UK: A Cautious Eye

For the United Kingdom, the government has remained open to a possible ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but insisting any decision must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, interest built behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. Nonetheless, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have expressed warnings. A prominent charity established by the relatives of a girl who was lost after viewing disturbing online content contends that a simple age ban could fail to improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the social media companies to build products and services that are appropriate and fit for children," stated a leading peer.

America: A State-by-State Picture

Stateside, regulation is largely occurring at the regional level amid national stalemate.

• The state of Utah demands guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a measure barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a law limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with additional access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed measures demanding guardian approval for teenagers to create social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and proposals from certain figures to follow the Australian path, a nationwide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

International Perspectives

Apart from the West, additional states are also considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, global organizations take a more nuanced stance. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "may even prove counterproductive". The body highlights that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated youth and that bans should not be a "substitute" for social media firms to improve child safeguards.

Even as this international discussion unfolds, the actions of the Australian government and its followers indicate that states around the world are increasingly prepared to wait for the industry to make changes on their own.